direct_design

News Blog

Build East Sussex

mike : February 9, 2012 8:42 am : Geosciences

We attended the Build East Sussex event on Tuesday.  A much better event, lots of new participants and a much more upbeat feeling.   This seems to echo the increases in work that we are seeing.   Hopefully 2012 will be a much better year!

I would be interested to know whether anyone else is seeing an upturn in work?

Leave a response »

Want to Work

mike : January 30, 2012 4:27 pm : Geosciences

Geo-Environmental are proud to be a part of Albion in the Communities want to work scheme.   We are one of the founding companies participating in this event, attending the formal launch of the scheme on the 10th November 2011 and also the formal  event on January 25th 2012 in the Houses of Parliament, hosted by Caroline Lucas MP.

Want to work is a new scheme run by Albion in the Community that has the aim of getting unemployed people a chance in experiencing a working environment, but also having an opportunity to impress an employer and perhaps gain a longer term contract or ideally a full-time role.

As part of our commitment we are looking to take on a new member of staff who will support the continued modernisation of our office.  This will be a great opportunity  for someone seeking work to get a start, but it is also a great opportunity for Geo-Environmental to get new and enthusiastic people involved with our business.

Want to work is just a part of our commitment towards supporting the community and developing talent.   We sponsor all of a staff in getting and MSc in Contaminated Land and are currently providing placement work to students studying at Brighton University.   With our support of Varndean College as well, Geo-Environmental is happy to support and nurture talent from school leavers upwards across the Sussex and Hampshire regions.

Leave a response »

43% fear not being able to pay next fuel bill – but get the right green deal

mike : January 24, 2012 10:28 pm : Geosciences

Two interesting stories related to renewables, firstly 43% of people fear not being able to pay the next fuel bill http://www.edie.net/news/news_story.asp?src=dnl&id=21679.  Renewables could be the answer, however the following story stating that Green Energy can Increase your Bills http://www.pressdisplay.com/pressdisplay/viewer.aspx.  Buyers take care to ensure that your green deal doesn’t become a green disappointment and ensure that your project is feasible before you go ahead.

We place a great emphasis on the feasibility of any proposed renewable energy installation.   From experience we know that if the fabric of a building is not right, the full benefits, in terms of performance and return on investment, of any renewable energy solution will not be realised.

As part of our service we advise where building improvements need to be made before you install a renewable energy solution, ensuring that you undertake the building improvements that will be most effective in reducing your energy costs and CO2 emissions

Leave a response »

Response to “Green policies are costing the Earth” in the Daily Telegraph

mike : January 24, 2012 7:28 pm : Geosciences

Have a look at this article, I disagree with it on a number of points, but I will let you decide for yourselves –  

 
1/ There is an inference that green policies are pushing up the price of fuel.  To the best of my knowledge all the recent price rises have been due to political/economic instability or winter weather.  Simple market forces rather than any environmental policies.
 
2/ The common agricultural policy is nothing to do with the green agenda – European politics I think.   Why is it mentioned in this article?
 
3/ Environmentalism and restrictive planning laws have been pushing up house prices for a generation – really?  When my house prices were going through the roof environmentalism wasn’t getting much air play at all, after the Stern review when environmentalism came much more to the forefront of policy, house prices tailed off.  At the time when house prices where rising I was working with a number of redevelopment agencies that where encouraging buy to lets in new developments.   I think policies like that and a lack of focus on house building are the issues, it can’t really be blamed on green policies – particularly as I see no particular signs that society has changed to be more sustainable.  The money to support green policies has been a pittance compared to the money spent to deal with the economic crisis, or support foreign policy in the middle east.   Why have green policies been singled out in this article.
 
For me the green agenda is about producing less waste and using less energy.   These have got to be good things which ever way you look at it.  In my lifetime oil and gas will run out in the North Sea and then we will be reliant on external sources for our fossil fuels.   I think that if we are to remain masters of our own destiny we need to think ‘greener’ (if you like) not rejecting the concept of a more sustainable society in the UK.
Leave a response »

Flood and Water Management Act 2010 and Transfer of Private Sewers to Water Companies

mike : January 13, 2012 4:31 pm : Geosciences

The consultation exercises for the new Flood and Water Management Act 2010 are currently underway for the automatic adoption arrangements for new foul sewers and lateral drains and National Build Standards for gravity foul sewers and lateral drains in England, as well as proposals to implement the requirements for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) in new and redeveloped sites in England, which are provided for in Schedule 3 of the Flood and Water Management Act (2010).

There are a couple of interesting points in proposals to the act that may need to be taken into consideration both now and in the future on new build and rennovation projects:

  1. All existing lateral drains and private sewers that connect to the public sewer system to be adopted by the water & sewerage companies (WASC’s) on 1st October 2011.
  2. Transfer will be automatic, although owners of private sewers will have the right of appeal.
  3. The adoption of existing privately owned sewer pumping stations and pumping mains will be delayed until 1st October 2016.
  4. Private drains should be designed to discharge to the front of the property
  5. A demarcation chamber to be constructed to denote the interface between the house owner and water company’s responsibility
  6. Adoptable sewers can be 100 mm diameter serving up to 10 properties (currently adoptable sewers are required to be 150mm minimum)
  7. Sewers to be located either under roads or in front gardens to improve ease of access for maintenance.
  8. The minimum distance for soakaways from buildings is 6m, rather than 5m.

If anyone has any other information and views we would be very happy to hear them.

Leave a response »

At last, the RHI has kicked off

mike : January 10, 2012 3:25 pm : Geosciences

The news that the first two applicants of the RHI have been revealed should hopefully start to get people thinking that they too can reap the benefits of low carbon heat and power.

For too long the focus has been on generating electricity, however, as a majority of your energy expenditure comes from heat and hot water, and in some cases cooling, this strategy seems to have ignored the opportunities that could have been taken to gain long-term energy security and vastly reduced carbon emissions from the range of solutions; Ground source and air source heat pumps, biomass, etc, that could meet this need.

Whilst this won’t be an instant game changer for the industry, it is a very positive step forward. Hopefully it will be the start in encouraging a much more sustainable approach to heating our homes and businesses.

If you want to know more, check out the story on http://www.edie.net/news/news_story.asp?src=dnl&id=21636

Leave a response »

Schools could pay for a new teacher through energy efficiency measures

mike : October 17, 2011 8:08 pm : Geosciences

Schools could save enough money to fund a newly qualified teacher if they install energy efficiency measures, according to the Carbon Trust.   UK schools account for over half of local authorities’ carbon emissions, with a total £543 million annual energy bill, of which as much as £135m could be saved through simple cost-effective measures typically paying back in less than 3 years.

For the full story click on http://www.edie.net/news/news_story.asp?src=dnl&id=21093

Leave a response »

Environmental Good Practice Guide

admin : September 6, 2011 9:03 am : Geosciences
If you get the chance you should check out the Environment Agency’s environmental best practice guide for ground source heating and cooling systems (GSHC):

http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/GEHO0311BTPA-E-E.pdf

According to the main environmental risks associated with GSHC schemes are listed below.

  • All GSHC systems can result in undesirable temperature changes in the ground and the water environment with impacts on water quality or aquatic ecology.
  • Both open loop systems and closed systems installed at depth can result in the interconnection of different aquifers units during drilling – affecting water quality or flow.
  • Closed loop systems may contain thermal transfer fluids which are toxic and can pollute groundwater if they leak

 

Open loop systems present the following additional environmental risks:

  • Localised increase in groundwater levels which could affect adjacent structures.
  • The potential impact of groundwater abstraction on the environment or other users of groundwater or surface water.

 

In extreme cases the Environment Agency could ask you to decommission the system and that would be very expensive.

The good news is that these problems can be prevented if you get a feasibility report prior to installation.   We can advise you of any potential contamination risks from your proposed heat pump installation and ensure that the only hot water you get into is your bath, rather than the environment agency!

The best advice we can give is to always check out the conditions of both the ground and your building before you commit to spending any money.  It could save you an awful lot of money and trouble in the long term.

3 Comments »

The role of micro-generation being missed in BBC report

admin : September 6, 2011 8:41 am : Geosciences
In an article on whether we can afford to be green:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14965099

The BBC question whether we can afford to be green. The article seems to infer that we have a choice between large scale renewables projects, such as wind farms and nuclear power. As the article appears on the BBC’s politics pages, you would have thought that they would be familiar with the fact that there can sometimes be a “third way”.

In this case, the third way not mentioned is micro-generation, which could have a major role to play in contributing towards protecting our energy security, with the added benefits of reducing carbon emissions and saving money in the long-term.

In the report a homeowner was interviewed who was living in fuel poverty, with bills of approximately £2,500/year. She had already insulated her house to a high level, but the cost of the recent gas and electric rises where becoming unaffordable. As energy prices are likely to continue to rise this problem is only likely to get worse.

I believe that the homeowner has other options. A well fitted and designed micro-generation system will put you in charge of your own energy and heating production, dramatically reducing your energy bills. It is possible to get loans and leasing options for installing renewable energy systems, you pay a reduced rate of VAT and in some cases grants are available from the Government.

Therefore it could be possible to get a loan to support the installation and you would still have lower outgoings than you previously had on your energy bills, with the knowledge that when the loan was paid off your annual energy bill would be hundreds of pounds rather than thousands of pounds.

So whilst I wouldn’t be too happy either about my gas and electric bills rising to support the building of wind farms or a nuclear power station, I know that there is something that you can do about that to put energy security back into your own hands.

1 Comment »